strategic planning

Frustrated with Strategic Plan Failure?

frustrated man pulling hair out cropped.jpg

Are you frustrated because your well thought-out strategic plan went nowhere? It is a common frustration for many owners and executives of private and public companies of all sizes and industries. Great plans often get wasted, sit on the shelf, don't get executed at all, or get executed very poorly. This blog is based entirely on my personal experiences with strategic plan and growth plan implementation across various entities and industries over my career as an executive, a member of a board of directors, an advisory board member, a consultant and an advisor. To bridge from a phrase trademarked by Farmers Insurance, “I know a thing or two because I have seen a thing or two.” I wish I could believe that I won’t have anything further to add to the commentary below regarding future failures, but unfortunately many other sources will also agree that more strategic plans fail than succeed. I am always very thankful for the successes.

Before you bash your laptop on your desk, scream at your employees or pull out all your remaining hair, I think it is usually helpful to take a breath, find a quiet place perhaps and try seriously to understand what went wrong. No one wants to make the same mistakes twice and you certainly don't want to pay for the effort twice. So… what went wrong?

  • Was it a bad plan or strategy?

  • Was there no implementation plan, project plan or action plan developed to guide the implementation process and make people accountable?

  • Did you assign a project manager or a champion within the organization to lead the implementation?

  • Did you allocate responsibility of key tasks to the wrong people for implementation?

  • Was monitoring and reporting of progress towards achievement of milestones, goals and objectives completed?

  • Did new crises in the business arise that distracted everyone from implementation?

  • Were the target dates too aggressive?

  • Were there too many strategies in the plan to maintain any degree of focus?

  • Did you have employee or project manager turnover that negatively impacted the implementation?

  • Was the plan not socialized or communicated well within your organization?

  • Were the strategic plan and related action / implementation plan not documented well?

  • Was your vision and leadership weak or perceived to be absent?

  • Did you as the owner or your leadership team take your eyes off the ball?

  • Did you find that some implementation team members had a litany of excuses (such as… too many other things to do, someone else didn’t get their task done, the dog ate my homework, etc.)?

After determining to the best of your ability what went wrong, there are usually good and better ways to fix or restart the strategic plan implementation. There are always alternatives. One alternative may be to toss the plan in the garbage and start over with a new planning process. Another option may be to restart the existing plan after tweaking it to correct for issues such as timing and assignment of personnel. Other common fixes might include:

  • Setting better and clear expectations

  • Prioritizing the strategies and action plans better

  • Better inclusion of key management and staff to get buy-in across the organization

  • Reallocation of responsibilities

  • Reset of target deadlines

  • Better monitoring and reporting on progress of implementation of the plan

  • Be more specific with strategies, action plans and milestones

  • Consider linking of employee’s pay to their performance related to key strategies to pay to help ensure a better focus on results

  • Reconsider priorities of the organization

It is easy and normal to be frustrated at the lack of progress particularly if the game plan was one of the first attempts in the organization to develop a formal strategic plan or a growth plan. I find often that owners and entrepreneurs will fall on their sword and take the blame themselves. It is genuinely helpful sometimes to admit your failure, get over it and just move on…particularly if that is true. One still has to figure out what to do next.

When you encounter issues with your business like this (especially if the emotional intensity of your frustration is high), sometimes the best thing to do in response to such a call for action ironically is to do nothing for a “moment”. Take a breath. Find a quiet place. Get up to a balcony on your business to give you a better overall perspective. Let everything settle in. Do some strategic thinking. Let the earth spin a little bit more. An ideal “moment” in this context might be an hour, a day, a week, a month or longer. Sometimes knee-jerking or obsessing over issues like this can be counterproductive. When your key people and relationships are at play, then sometimes extra care is warranted. Business by definition is dynamic, circumstances change and you may have an opportunity to choreograph a better and more elegant result than you might achieve if you simply jump up and down in a “tantrum” dance.

Even in the circumstances of a failed plan or failed implementation, all is not lost. Generally speaking a significant part of the value of the strategic planning process is found in the journey and not so much the destination or the output. The learning in the process of developing the strategic plan usually stays with you. As a result you usually acquire a deeper understanding of your business, your potential opportunities and challenges, and how you are positioned in your industry and the market.

Companies and organizations need some type of plan to guide the organization's development, growth and strategic direction. Flying by the seat of the pants is not usually an effective strategy. Explicit documentation of your company’s game plan is usually helpful and necessary as a communication tool. This is particularly true for larger organizations where many people need to understand and be part of the implementation of some strategies, but it simply isn’t possible or practical to directly involve everyone in the strategic planning process.

If you are frustrated from failed or even mediocre attempts at strategic planning or implementation in your organization, I would encourage you to evaluate your past experience as a learning opportunity. You might then be in a better position to either fix identified issues or salvage your most recent plan… or replace it with a better process and plan on your next attempt. You can’t replace the hairs that you pulled out of your head in your frustrated grasping, but you can allow new hair to grow in.

 

A feature article by Dwayne Coben of Coben Advisory Inc. (www.coben.ca). Coben Advisory is a specialized corporate & executive advisory firm that offers services to help our clients plan, improve, grow and/or exit their businesses.

Smartly Screen New Potential Opportunities ... Chase the Best Gazelle!


Leading companies have a good process or tool for screening potential new opportunities. This doesn’t guarantee success of good ideas but, if used properly, should keep the organization focused on the best opportunities and minimize the distraction and wasted effort of pursuing opportunities that are weak or not a good fit at this time. Generally speaking, you can’t chase all the gazelles in the herd…a shrewd hunter has to be selective.

Annual or periodic strategic planning will usually provide the foundational direction and guidance for the organization’s success in the future. However, in the interim along the way, “stuff” happens, things change and opportunities often emerge. These opportunities will get dealt with one way or another – pursued, back-burnered, killed or just ignored.

I have found there is a great deal of wasted investment in companies on chasing ideas that should never be chased or chasing ideas that should have been refined and/or defined better at the front end. It is not uncommon for individuals, teams or departments in organizations to immediately go deep in analysis and spend inordinate amounts of time and money debating, researching and evaluating potential new investments, strategies, and product or service ideas without ever having checked the basics. I advocate that a client should have readily available a “quick and dirty” evaluation tool that guides people within the company to systematically answer some important questions up front before proceeding further down the rabbit hole (or the prospective gold mine).

I have witnessed many times in companies that I have worked in or advised the inherent conflict between individuals in business / corporate development groups, sales groups and marketing groups as well as other areas of the company (including finance). Many people have what they think are great ideas about new products, services, markets, acquisitions, partnerships, etc. and they want to preserve the credit for the ideas. I don't believe any group has a monopoly on great ideas. However, ideas can get pushed down the road a significant distance “in secret” before they are revealed and before they are tested against all the key criteria for a good investment. Ideas sometimes get slammed shut before they see the light of day because they originated from what the organisation considered to be the wrong source.

Personally I think it is helpful for all employees to keep in perspective what their respective roles and responsibilities are and to generally keep from straying into other areas of work. The challenge for effective management is to provide an appropriate channel for bringing creative, innovative and potentially profitable new ideas to the surface quickly and giving employees the tools for ensuring it is a reasonable opportunity without spending much time on it before they go further. I have found that some employees and departments are not familiar with the basics of what makes for a great opportunity for the company. They may understand that it must be profitable in the end, but have not been involved in the evaluation process sufficiently to understand the other dimensions of a good evaluation. I don’t believe there is any benefit to the organization to keep the key elements of such evaluation a “mystery”. I advocate that the CFO or business development group (or whatever person or group is appropriate for a given organization) should provide direction to all employees of the expectation for initial evaluation of a new business proposal.

Even within a business evaluation or project evaluation group, there is sometimes inconsistency in the level of and standards for early screening of projects. Providing an outline of the standard or the criteria by which such proposals will be evaluated is usually appreciated by and helpful to all employees as it gives them guidance to focus their effort. It generally saves a lot of wasted time and effort and provides for a better result leading to more effective decision making.

I have used a fairly standard template for evaluation of new “anything”, whether it be a new product or service, new business line, corporate acquisition, merger, partnership, investment, expansion, or other business proposals. Over my career, I have developed a tailored or modified version of the same for many clients when requested or when I thought it would be helpful for their consideration in terms of a specific decision.

A simplified outline of that screening tool is below. Note that it is not intended that every question in the tool has a hard answer in every situation or business, but I generally find it good business practice to at least consider each and every question to determine its relevance and develop an appropriate response at an early stage of the project. This is not a substitution for a full business case which may be required for approval depending on the policies at a respected company, but is instead meant as an initial “sniff test".

 

Strategic fit

  • Must have overall fit with corporate and business strategy

    • Opportunity is located within the target markets?

    • Opportunity supports or enhances current and anticipated product/service lines?

    • Opportunity can be supported by existing, new or improved distribution channels?

  • Must create some form of competitive advantage (e.g. cost leadership, differentiation) to the company’s core business

Financial

  • Must contribute to profitability and company value

    • Opportunity is expected to generate positive cumulative discounted cash flow, including consideration of upfront (pre-commercialization) investment and incremental working capital requirements?

    • Opportunity is expected to generate returns in excess of other available opportunities (with similar risks) competing for the company’s resources

    • Break-even point is analyzed

  • Assumptions contained in the opportunity analysis must be reasonable and supportable

  • All risk related to the opportunity must be identified and quantified, including for example market and commodity price risk, environmental risk and regulatory risk

Market

  • Must provide potential growth in the company’s target geographic regions and customer markets / segments

  • Must provide the potential for a significant and sustainable share of a target market

  • Target market and identified major potential customers or customer segments for the opportunity have been identified and quantified

  • Competitors have been listed and details of related market shares and competitive advantages are compared and understood

  • Pricing strategy has been analyzed

  • Advertising, marketing, sales and distribution strategies have been analyzed

  • Potential protection of intellectual property rights (e.g. patents) have been considered

Management and Staff

  • Existing (or other specifically-identified proven acquirable) resources possess the required skills, experience and knowledge to assure success of opportunity

Deal structure

  • The legal structure of the opportunity must be consistent with the company’s objectives, particularly related to risk management

  • Opportunity financing and funding must fit within the company’s targeted financial structure and capital availability

Exit strategy

  • Must have a viable exit strategy or “choke point” established

 

A simple screening tool can better focus your resources on the best new opportunities, reduce internal conflict, and aid in development of commercial acumen within your organization. The tool may not provide assurance that you get a gazelle meal today, but it should help ensure you are going after reasonable prospects and not needlessly wasting your energy.

 

A feature article by Dwayne Coben of Coben Advisory Inc. (www.coben.ca). Coben Advisory is a specialized corporate & executive advisory firm that offers services to help our clients plan, improve, grow and/or exit their businesses.